
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600M across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅25.7% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Radeon RX 6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅25.7% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600M across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600M better than Intel Arc Pro B60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B60 make more sense than Radeon RX 6600M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 313 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and Radeon RX 6600M

Intel Arc Pro B60
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the Radeon RX 6600M reaches 13,922 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon RX 6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600M).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 13,922 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+42% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2416 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (FL 12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6600M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 139.2+102% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 23 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #175 | #173 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













