
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅47.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅47.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RadeonT RX 6850M XT better than Intel Arc Pro B60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B60 make more sense than RadeonT RX 6850M XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 157 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

Intel Arc Pro B60
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 40 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 13,992+1% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2581 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 40+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro B60 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has 12 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 19.2% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 165W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82-4% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 84.8+23% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The Intel Arc Pro B60 costs 50% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 97.1% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-50% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6+97% | 14.0 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 22 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #175 | #103 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













