
GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 324.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 267mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌19% higher power demand at 250W vs 210W.
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅14.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅25% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 192).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 250W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌309.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5070
2025RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 324.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 267mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅14.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅25% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 192).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 250W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌19% higher power demand at 250W vs 210W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌309.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 better than RTX 4500 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 4500 Ada Generation still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 914 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 763 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2070 MHz to 2580 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,850 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 and the RTX 4500 Ada Generation reaches 27,850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 7,680 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 39.63 TFLOPS (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 2580 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 60 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) with 192 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854+4% | 27,850 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 7680+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS | 39.63 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz | 2580 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 80 | 80 |
| TMUs | 192 | 240+25% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 7.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 60+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 240+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 4500 Ada Generation is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has 24 GB. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 448 GB/s (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+50% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12.2 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 210W — a 17.4% difference. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 650W (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 210W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4 | 132.6+15% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation launched at $2250. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 75.6% less ($1701 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12.4 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 324.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-76% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.6+324% | 12.4 |
| Codename | GB205 | AD103 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #22 | #27 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












