
GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 250% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌46.7% longer card at 245mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅45.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 192).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 245mm, a 78mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌264.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5070
2025RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 250% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅45.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 192).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 245mm, a 78mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌46.7% longer card at 245mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌264.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 better than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 and the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition reaches 30,020 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 192 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854 | 30,020+4% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 8960+46% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS+20% | 25.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz+75% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 192 | 280+46% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 8.8 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 70+46% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 280+46% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 245mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 245mm | 167mm |
| Height | 115mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4 | 428.9+272% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 72.5% less ($1450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 250.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-73% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.6+251% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GB205 | GB203 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #22 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












