
GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1087.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅24.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅129.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 192).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1174.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1087.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅24.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅129.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 192).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1174.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 5070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 5070 make more sense than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 199 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 963 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 774 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 697 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 520 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 30,968 — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell leads by 7.3%. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 192 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854 | 30,968+7% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 14080+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+117% |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz+6% | 2377 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 176+120% |
| TMUs | 192 | 440+129% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 13.8 MB+130% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 110+129% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 440+129% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 5070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-4% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4+12% | 103.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 92.2% less ($6450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 4.4 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 1095.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-92% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.6+1095% | 4.4 |
| Codename | GB205 | GB202 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #22 | #13 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












