
GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅59.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 57.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅66.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 192).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌63.9% HIGHER MSRP$900 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅59.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 57.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅66.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 192).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌63.9% HIGHER MSRP$900 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 better than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 and the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) reaches 29,964 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 192 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854 | 29,964+4% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS+287% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz+61% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+140% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+20% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 320+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5070 is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5070 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 5070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 5070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 77.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 245mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 110W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 245mm | 0mm |
| Height | 115mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4 | 272.4+136% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 39% less ($351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 58% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-39% | $900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.6+58% | 33.3 |
| Codename | GB205 | TU104 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #22 | #201 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












