G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 760

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅218.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 238.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 760

2013

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅218.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 238.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX 760?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 averages 218.8% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 4,813 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 760 is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 306.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 is about 20.1% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 218.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 306.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 760 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 760 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 760 is 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 4,813 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 760 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
1080p
low	78 FPS	167 FPS
medium	66 FPS	152 FPS
high	53 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	68 FPS	137 FPS
medium	60 FPS	114 FPS
high	42 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	90 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	86 FPS
medium	23 FPS	74 FPS
high	15 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 760 Open GeForce RTX 4060

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
1080p
low	124 FPS	392 FPS
medium	89 FPS	334 FPS
high	66 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	211 FPS
1440p
low	68 FPS	240 FPS
medium	45 FPS	209 FPS
high	32 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	119 FPS
medium	17 FPS	98 FPS
high	13 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	63 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 760 Open GeForce RTX 4060

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
1080p
low	217 FPS	812 FPS
medium	173 FPS	642 FPS
high	144 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	440 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	535 FPS
medium	130 FPS	443 FPS
high	108 FPS	379 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	365 FPS
medium	87 FPS	297 FPS
high	72 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	186 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 760 Open GeForce RTX 4060

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
1080p
low	150 FPS	746 FPS
medium	110 FPS	613 FPS
high	94 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	440 FPS
1440p
low	117 FPS	594 FPS
medium	88 FPS	486 FPS
high	75 FPS	421 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	358 FPS
medium	48 FPS	308 FPS
high	38 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	220 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 760 Open GeForce RTX 4060

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 306.2%. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 2460 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score	4,813	19,548+306%
Architecture	Kepler	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1152	3072+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.378 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS+535%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	2460 MHz+138%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	96	96
L1 Cache	0.09 MB	3 MB+3233%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	24 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 760 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 41.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	272 GB/s+42%
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	24 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.3	4.6+7%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	H.264	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 38.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 73°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060
TDP	170W	115W-32%
Recommended PSU	500W-9%	550W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	241mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	73°C-9%
Perf/Watt	28.3	170.0+501%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce GTX 760 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 238.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).