G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 760

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅302.7% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 193.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 760

2013

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅302.7% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 193.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 760?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 302.7% more FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 4,813 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 760 is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 370.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 60.2% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 302.7% more estimated average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data and 370.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 760 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 760 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 760 is 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 4,813 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 760 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	100 FPS	177 FPS
medium	86 FPS	162 FPS
high	68 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	143 FPS
medium	77 FPS	118 FPS
high	53 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	93 FPS
medium	26 FPS	79 FPS
high	17 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 760 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	137 FPS	433 FPS
medium	94 FPS	363 FPS
high	70 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	240 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	278 FPS
medium	47 FPS	238 FPS
high	34 FPS	194 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	161 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	123 FPS
medium	17 FPS	102 FPS
high	13 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	65 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 760 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	217 FPS	855 FPS
medium	173 FPS	693 FPS
high	144 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	510 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	660 FPS
medium	130 FPS	527 FPS
high	108 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	447 FPS
medium	87 FPS	355 FPS
high	72 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	255 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 760 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	150 FPS	775 FPS
medium	110 FPS	639 FPS
high	94 FPS	558 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	492 FPS
1440p
low	117 FPS	613 FPS
medium	88 FPS	503 FPS
high	75 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	375 FPS
medium	48 FPS	322 FPS
high	38 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	255 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 760 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 370.6%. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 2535 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	4,813	22,651+371%
Architecture	Kepler	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1152	4352+278%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.378 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS+828%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	2535 MHz+145%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	96	136+42%
L1 Cache	0.09 MB	4.3 MB+4678%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	32 MB+6300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 760 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	288 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	32 MB+6300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.3	4.6+7%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 6.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	170W	160W-6%
Recommended PSU	500W-9%	550W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	241mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	28.3	141.6+400%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 760 costs 37.6% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 194.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).