
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,747 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+77.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 24.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+77.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 24.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,747 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 77.7%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747 | 22,651+78% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 4352+183% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+306% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2535 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 136+42% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4.3 MB+187% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-25% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2 | 141.6+33% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti costs 30.1% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 24.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-30% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7 | 56.8+24% |
| Codename | TU116 | AD106 |
| Release | February 22 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #204 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












