
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅180.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅180.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 201.5%. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 22,172+202% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 5888+283% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+1124% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1725 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 96 | 184+92% |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 5.8 MB+936% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980M is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 180% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 448 GB/s+180% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-55% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 100.8+37% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Codename | GM204 | GA104 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #344 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












