
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 170W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌142.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+247.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 743.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌36% higher power demand at 170W vs 125W.
CMP 30HX
2021GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 170W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+247.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 743.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌142.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌36% higher power demand at 170W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 30HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce RTX 3060

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 30HX scores 4,892 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 247.4%. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 16,995+247% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 3584+155% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+153% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 112+27% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 3.5 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 30HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 30.5% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-26% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 100.0+156% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 58.8% less ($470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 747.5% better value.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $329-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 51.7+748% |
| Codename | TU116 | GA106 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #447 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












