
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅159.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅159.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 176.2%. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 20,312+176% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 4864+217% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+876% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1665 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 96 | 152+58% |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 4.8 MB+757% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980M is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 180% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 448 GB/s+180% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-50% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 101.6+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | GM204 | GA104 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #344 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












