
Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 12.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 12.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega 64 better than Radeon Vega Frontier Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Vega Frontier Edition still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 98 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition reaches 12,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,891+1% | 12,753 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS | 13.11 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1600 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 268mm |
| Height | 111mm | 105mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 51.6+21% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition launched at $999. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 40% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.8 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 68% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-40% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5+68% | 12.8 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #202 | #203 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












