Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

2017Core: 1382 MHzBoost: 1600 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 12.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 66.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Vega 64 better than Radeon Vega Frontier Edition?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,891 vs 12,753 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (250W vs 300W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro Vega 64 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $599 MSRP. Radeon Pro Vega 64 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro Vega 64 is about $400 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 1.1% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $599 MSRP gets you lower power draw (250W vs 300W), and FSR upscaling.
Is Radeon Vega Frontier Edition still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $999 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon Pro Vega 64 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
1080p
low106 FPS140 FPS
medium96 FPS130 FPS
high81 FPS110 FPS
ultra67 FPS84 FPS
1440p
low94 FPS125 FPS
medium81 FPS107 FPS
high65 FPS89 FPS
ultra55 FPS70 FPS
4K
low47 FPS57 FPS
medium42 FPS50 FPS
high32 FPS40 FPS
ultra29 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
1080p
low301 FPS331 FPS
medium262 FPS285 FPS
high203 FPS225 FPS
ultra164 FPS179 FPS
1440p
low204 FPS215 FPS
medium175 FPS185 FPS
high144 FPS158 FPS
ultra114 FPS124 FPS
4K
low100 FPS99 FPS
medium84 FPS83 FPS
high71 FPS71 FPS
ultra56 FPS55 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
1080p
low580 FPS524 FPS
medium464 FPS450 FPS
high387 FPS381 FPS
ultra290 FPS287 FPS
1440p
low435 FPS413 FPS
medium348 FPS344 FPS
high290 FPS287 FPS
ultra218 FPS215 FPS
4K
low290 FPS258 FPS
medium232 FPS215 FPS
high193 FPS173 FPS
ultra145 FPS135 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
1080p
low258 FPS354 FPS
medium213 FPS286 FPS
high180 FPS248 FPS
ultra151 FPS214 FPS
1440p
low196 FPS271 FPS
medium162 FPS223 FPS
high133 FPS184 FPS
ultra112 FPS159 FPS
4K
low118 FPS153 FPS
medium105 FPS136 FPS
high85 FPS119 FPS
ultra70 FPS98 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

AMD

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition reaches 12,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1600 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
G3D Mark Score
12,891+1%
12,753
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
4096
4096
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.06 TFLOPS
13.11 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1600 MHz+19%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
256
256
L1 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
TDP
250W-17%
300W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
267mm
268mm
Height
111mm
105mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
51.6+21%
42.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition launched at $999. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 40% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.8 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 68% better value.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP
$599-40%
$999
Performance per Dollar
21.5+68%
12.8
Codename
Vega 10
Vega 10
Release
June 27 2017
June 27 2017
Ranking
#202
#203