
Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 208.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌217% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 208.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌217% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro VII better than Radeon Pro Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 69 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 149 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon Pro VII

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon Pro VII reaches 13,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Pro VII uses GCN 5.1, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,891 | 13,264+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+7% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS | 13.06 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1700 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+7% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+6% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro VII has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro VII's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro VII is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 500W (Radeon Pro VII). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 305mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 51.6 | 53.1+3% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 68.5% less ($1300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 207.1% better value. The Radeon Pro VII is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-68% | $1899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5+207% | 7.0 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 20 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #202 | #194 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












