
Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌39.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌39.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than Radeon Pro Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon PRO W7500

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,891 | 13,298+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+129% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1700 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+129% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7500 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 216mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.6 | 190.0+268% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 28.4% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 44.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $429-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 31.0+44% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #202 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












