
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon Sky 500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $445 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 823.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Sky 500: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Sky 500 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Sky 500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅6.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌809.1% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $445 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 823.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Sky 500: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Sky 500 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅6.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Sky 500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌809.1% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 560X (móvel) better than Radeon Sky 500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Sky 500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560X (móvel) and Radeon Sky 500

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon Sky 500
Radeon Sky 500
The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) scores 4,800 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,800+2% | 4,723 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.611 TFLOPS+7% | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Sky 500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) draws 65W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 79.1% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 73.8+134% | 31.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55 MSRP, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 89% less ($445 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 828.7% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-89% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3+829% | 9.4 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Pitcairn |
| Release | April 11 2018 | March 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #483 | #455 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












