
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1352.7% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $744 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1325.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
CMP 30HX
2021Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $744 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1325.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1352.7% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is CMP 30HX better than Radeon RX 560X (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 560X (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1202 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892+2% | 4,800 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+38% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+93% | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+49% | 1202 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+38% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+460% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 30HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 65W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 73.8+89% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 93.1% less ($744 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 1331.1% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $55-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 87.3+1331% |
| Codename | TU116 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #447 | #483 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












