
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2018Why buy it
- ✅4.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 87.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2018Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅4.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 87.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega 16 better than Radeon RX 560X (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 560X (móvel) make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 16?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 4,809 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1202 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,809 | 4,800 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.437 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 1202 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 65W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 64.1 | 73.8+15% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($55 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $55 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 87.3 |
| Codename | Vega 12 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | November 14 2018 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #451 | #483 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












