
Radeon R9 370
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌170.9% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.7 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $94 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 370: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon R9 370
2015Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $94 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 370: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌170.9% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.7 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 560X (móvel) better than Radeon R9 370?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 370 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 370 and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 370 scores 4,722 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 370) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1202 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,722 | 4,800+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 1202 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 370 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179 GB/s (Radeon R9 370) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — a 59.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 370. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179 GB/s+60% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 370 draws 110W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 51.4% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 370) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 65W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 42.9 | 73.8+72% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 370 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 63.1% less ($94 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 175.4% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $55-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.7 | 87.3+175% |
| Codename | Trinidad | Polaris 21 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #456 | #483 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












