
GeForce GTX 580
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 580
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌234.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌121.8% higher power demand at 244W vs 110W.
Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 241.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 244W, a 134W reduction.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 267mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 580
2010Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 241.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 244W, a 134W reduction.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 267mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌234.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌121.8% higher power demand at 244W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 370 better than GeForce GTX 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 580 make more sense than Radeon R9 370?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 580 and Radeon R9 370

GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 580 scores 4,634 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 1.581 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,634 | 4,722+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1280+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.581 TFLOPS | 2.496 TFLOPS+58% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 580 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 370 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 580 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 580) vs 179 GB/s (Radeon R9 370) — a 7.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 580. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce GTX 580) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 370) — the GeForce GTX 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+7% | 179 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 580) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 580) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 580 draws 244W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 75.7% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 580) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 244W | 110W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 19.0 | 42.9+126% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 580 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. The Radeon R9 370 costs 70.1% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.3 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 240.9% better value. The Radeon R9 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $149-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3 | 31.7+241% |
| Codename | GF110 | Trinidad |
| Release | November 9 2010 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #458 | #456 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












