
GeForce GTX 580
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 580
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌78.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 17.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌22% higher power demand at 244W vs 200W.
Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.1 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 244W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 580
2010Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.1 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 244W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌78.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 17.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌22% higher power demand at 244W vs 200W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 better than GeForce GTX 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 580 make more sense than Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 12 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 580 and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,765 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 580 scores 4,634 and the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 reaches 4,765 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Raw compute: 1.581 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,634 | 4,765+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1792+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.581 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+81% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+127% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 580 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 3 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 580) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) — a 25% advantage for the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 240 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580) vs 12 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 580) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 580) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 580 draws 244W versus the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280's 200W — a 19.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 580) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 278mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 244W | 200W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 278mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 19.0 | 23.8+25% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 580 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 costs 44.1% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.3 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 17.1 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) — the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 offers 83.9% better value. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $279-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3 | 17.1+84% |
| Codename | GF110 | Tahiti |
| Release | November 9 2010 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #458 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












