Radeon R9 370 vs RTXA5000-24Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,572 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2355.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 230W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

RTXA5000-24Q

2021

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
2397.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,721 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌109.1% higher power demand at 230W vs 110W.

Radeon R9 370

2015

RTXA5000-24Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,572 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2355.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 230W, a 120W reduction.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
2397.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,721 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌109.1% higher power demand at 230W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

So, is RTXA5000-24Q better than Radeon R9 370?

Yes. RTXA5000-24Q is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 4,803 vs 4,722 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTXA5000-24Q is a 2021 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon R9 370 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTXA5000-24Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTXA5000-24Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. RTXA5000-24Q is about 2397.3% more expensive on MSRP at $3,721 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 370 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 370 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 370 is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 4,722 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 370 Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-24Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon R9 370	RTXA5000-24Q
1080p
low	78 FPS	136 FPS
medium	66 FPS	116 FPS
high	53 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	69 FPS	107 FPS
medium	59 FPS	89 FPS
high	42 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	39 FPS
medium	23 FPS	35 FPS
high	15 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	23 FPS

Open Radeon R9 370 Open RTXA5000-24Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon R9 370	RTXA5000-24Q
1080p
low	111 FPS	216 FPS
medium	82 FPS	173 FPS
high	63 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	63 FPS	161 FPS
medium	42 FPS	125 FPS
high	31 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	23 FPS	77 FPS
medium	16 FPS	63 FPS
high	12 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	8 FPS	51 FPS

Open Radeon R9 370 Open RTXA5000-24Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon R9 370	RTXA5000-24Q
1080p
low	212 FPS	216 FPS
medium	170 FPS	173 FPS
high	142 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	159 FPS	162 FPS
medium	127 FPS	130 FPS
high	106 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	106 FPS	108 FPS
medium	85 FPS	86 FPS
high	71 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	54 FPS

Open Radeon R9 370 Open RTXA5000-24Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon R9 370	RTXA5000-24Q
1080p
low	136 FPS	214 FPS
medium	109 FPS	173 FPS
high	94 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	99 FPS	151 FPS
medium	82 FPS	128 FPS
high	71 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	59 FPS	87 FPS
medium	45 FPS	72 FPS
high	35 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	44 FPS

Open Radeon R9 370 Open RTXA5000-24Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 370 and RTXA5000-24Q

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

RTXA5000-24Q

The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 370 scores 4,722 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 370) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	RTXA5000-24Q
G3D Mark Score	4,722	4,803+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1280	8192+540%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+1013%
Boost Clock	975 MHz	1695 MHz+74%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L1 Cache	0.38 MB	8 MB+2005%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	6 MB+1100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-24Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 370 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	RTXA5000-24Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-24Q has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	RTXA5000-24Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	6 MB+1100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 370 draws 110W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 70.6% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 370) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	RTXA5000-24Q
TDP	110W-52%	230W
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	221mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	42.9+105%	20.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 370 launched at $149 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721. The Radeon R9 370 costs 96% less ($3572 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) vs 1.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 2338.5% better value. The RTXA5000-24Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).