
Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌7.2% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌21500% longer card at 216mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 216mm, a 215mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 216mm, a 215mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌7.2% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌21500% longer card at 216mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than Radeon RX 6600S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6600S make more sense than Radeon PRO W7500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 112 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and Radeon RX 6600S

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S
The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the Radeon RX 6600S reaches 13,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6600S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600S).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,298+2% | 13,016 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.19 TFLOPS+70% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 2000 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600S has 4 GB. The Radeon PRO W7500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 80W — a 13.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 216mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-13% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 216mm | 1mm |
| Height | 115mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 190.0+17% | 162.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600S launched at $400. The Radeon RX 6600S costs 6.8% less ($29 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 32.5 (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Radeon RX 6600S offers 4.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $400-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.0 | 32.5+5% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #192 | #200 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













