
Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅17.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌342.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌41.2% longer card at 305mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,470 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 343.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 305mm, a 89mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅17.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,470 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 343.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 305mm, a 89mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌342.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌41.2% longer card at 305mm vs 216mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than Radeon Pro VII?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro VII still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro VII and Radeon PRO W7500

Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro VII scores 13,264 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro VII is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,264 | 13,298 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+114% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.06 TFLOPS+7% | 12.19 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+114% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro VII comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro VII) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon Pro VII has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro VII draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro VII) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 216mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.1 | 190.0+258% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 77.4% less ($1470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 342.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1899 | $429-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 31.0+343% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 13 2020 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #194 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













