
Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:

RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A2000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌322% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌82.6% longer card at 305mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,449 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 328.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 305mm, a 138mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro VII
2020RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,449 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 328.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 305mm, a 138mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A2000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌322% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌82.6% longer card at 305mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A2000 better than Radeon Pro VII?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro VII still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro VII and RTX A2000

Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.

RTX A2000
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro VII scores 13,264 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro VII is built on GCN 5.1 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,264 | 13,464+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+15% | 3328 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.06 TFLOPS+64% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz+42% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+131% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 3.3 MB+251% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro VII relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro VII comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro VII) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the Radeon Pro VII has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro VII draws 250W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro VII) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.1 | 192.3+262% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. The RTX A2000 costs 76.3% less ($1449 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 offers 327.1% better value. The RTX A2000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1899 | $450-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 29.9+327% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GA106 |
| Release | May 13 2020 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #194 | #186 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













