
Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅44.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
Radeon Pro VII
2020RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅44.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro VII better than RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile make more sense than Radeon Pro VII?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro VII and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro VII scores 13,264 and the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile reaches 13,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro VII is built on GCN 5.1 while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,264 | 13,209 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+114% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.06 TFLOPS+45% | 9.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 2520 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 240+329% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.8 MB+91% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro VII relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro VII comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro VII) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+500% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro VII draws 250W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro VII) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 35W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.1 | 377.4+611% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1899 | — |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GB207 |
| Release | May 13 2020 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #194 | #244 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













