
Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 70W vs 35W.
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅40.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 70W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7500
2023RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅40.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 70W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 70W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than Radeon PRO W7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 152 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 152 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 99 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,508 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 13,508 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12,800 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 100 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 400.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,298 | 13,508+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 12800+614% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.19 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+436% |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 2025 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 112 | 400+257% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 12.5 MB+2400% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 100+257% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The Radeon PRO W7500 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 72 MB (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 35W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 35W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | 0mm |
| Height | 115mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 190.0 | 385.9+103% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













