Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX A2000

AMD

Radeon PRO W7500

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1700 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX A2000

2021Core: 562 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

  • 11.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $21 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 29.3% longer card at 216mm vs 167mm.

RTX A2000

2021

Why buy it

  • Measures 167mm instead of 216mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 4.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $450 MSRPvs$429 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A2000 better than Radeon PRO W7500?
Yes. RTX A2000 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 1.2% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7500 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX A2000 is about 4.9% more expensive on MSRP at $450 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W7500 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX A2000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W7500 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does Radeon PRO W7500 make more sense than RTX A2000?
Yes. Radeon PRO W7500 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $429 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A2000. The trade-off is that RTX A2000 currently gives you 1.2% higher G3D Mark and lower estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon PRO W7500 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
1080p
low136 FPS108 FPS
medium119 FPS92 FPS
high104 FPS76 FPS
ultra85 FPS51 FPS
1440p
low122 FPS92 FPS
medium101 FPS78 FPS
high86 FPS58 FPS
ultra73 FPS38 FPS
4K
low66 FPS38 FPS
medium58 FPS35 FPS
high40 FPS22 FPS
ultra34 FPS18 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
1080p
low339 FPS164 FPS
medium284 FPS132 FPS
high224 FPS106 FPS
ultra174 FPS82 FPS
1440p
low212 FPS118 FPS
medium179 FPS95 FPS
high142 FPS78 FPS
ultra114 FPS60 FPS
4K
low99 FPS70 FPS
medium83 FPS55 FPS
high69 FPS47 FPS
ultra53 FPS34 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
1080p
low598 FPS606 FPS
medium479 FPS485 FPS
high399 FPS404 FPS
ultra299 FPS303 FPS
1440p
low414 FPS428 FPS
medium356 FPS361 FPS
high291 FPS303 FPS
ultra224 FPS227 FPS
4K
low299 FPS303 FPS
medium239 FPS242 FPS
high187 FPS190 FPS
ultra141 FPS147 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
1080p
low522 FPS245 FPS
medium453 FPS212 FPS
high386 FPS172 FPS
ultra299 FPS144 FPS
1440p
low425 FPS187 FPS
medium359 FPS166 FPS
high298 FPS130 FPS
ultra224 FPS106 FPS
4K
low267 FPS106 FPS
medium239 FPS88 FPS
high199 FPS71 FPS
ultra150 FPS56 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and RTX A2000

AMD

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

NVIDIA

RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 26 (RTX A2000) vs 104.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
G3D Mark Score
13,298
13,464+1%
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1792
3328+86%
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.19 TFLOPS+53%
7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1700 MHz+42%
1200 MHz
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
112+8%
104
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
3.3 MB+560%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores
28+8%
26

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).

FeatureRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
Encoder
VCN 4.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 4.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
TDP
70W
70W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
216mm
167mm
Height
115mm
68mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
190.0
192.3+1%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 4.7% less ($21 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 3.7% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).

FeatureRadeon PRO W7500RTX A2000
MSRP
$429-5%
$450
Performance per Dollar
31.0+4%
29.9
Codename
Navi 33
GA106
Release
August 3 2023
August 10 2021
Ranking
#192
#186