
Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:

RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅11.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌29.3% longer card at 216mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 216mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌4.9% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
Radeon PRO W7500
2023RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅11.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 216mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌29.3% longer card at 216mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌4.9% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A2000 better than Radeon PRO W7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7500 make more sense than RTX A2000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and RTX A2000

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

RTX A2000
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 26 (RTX A2000) vs 104.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,298 | 13,464+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3328+86% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.19 TFLOPS+53% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz+42% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+8% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3.3 MB+560% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+8% | 26 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | 167mm |
| Height | 115mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 190.0 | 192.3+1% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 4.7% less ($21 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 3.7% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-5% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.0+4% | 29.9 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA106 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #192 | #186 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













