
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌412.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅21.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,771 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 410.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅21.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,771 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 410.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌412.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Radeon PRO W7500

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369 | 13,298 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+129% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1700 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+129% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7500 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 216mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 216mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 190.0+255% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 80.5% less ($1771 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 408.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200 | $429-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 31.0+408% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #190 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













