G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
83.5% HIGHER MSRP
$2,200 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

✅35.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅35.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
83.5% HIGHER MSRP
$2,200 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is Titan X Pascal better than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?

Yes. Titan X Pascal is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 35.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.2% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Titan X Pascal is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Titan X Pascal is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Titan X Pascal is about $1,001 cheaper on MSRP at $1,199 MSRP versus $2,200 MSRP, and you are getting 35.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 87.5%. Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the newer 2019 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon Pro Vega 64X make more sense than Titan X Pascal?

Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 64X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $2,200 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Titan X Pascal. The trade-off is that Titan X Pascal currently gives you 2.2% higher G3D Mark and 35.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 87.5%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X Benchmark Check

Titan X Pascal Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	108 FPS	146 FPS
medium	98 FPS	130 FPS
high	83 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	96 FPS	126 FPS
medium	82 FPS	103 FPS
high	66 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	48 FPS	73 FPS
medium	43 FPS	62 FPS
high	33 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	41 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X Open Titan X Pascal

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	301 FPS	339 FPS
medium	262 FPS	296 FPS
high	203 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	204 FPS	215 FPS
medium	175 FPS	187 FPS
high	144 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	121 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	104 FPS
medium	84 FPS	88 FPS
high	71 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	57 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X Open Titan X Pascal

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	526 FPS	615 FPS
medium	452 FPS	492 FPS
high	383 FPS	410 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	307 FPS
1440p
low	413 FPS	461 FPS
medium	347 FPS	369 FPS
high	296 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	258 FPS	307 FPS
medium	214 FPS	246 FPS
high	173 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	154 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X Open Titan X Pascal

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	258 FPS	519 FPS
medium	213 FPS	449 FPS
high	180 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	307 FPS
1440p
low	197 FPS	422 FPS
medium	162 FPS	367 FPS
high	133 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	118 FPS	259 FPS
medium	105 FPS	246 FPS
high	85 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	154 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X Open Titan X Pascal

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Titan X Pascal

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

Titan X Pascal

The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
G3D Mark Score	13,369	13,660+2%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Pascal
Process Node	14 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	4096+14%	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.03 TFLOPS+10%	10.97 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	1531 MHz+4%
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	256+14%	224
L1 Cache	1 MB	1.3 MB+30%
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal has 8 GB. The Titan X Pascal offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
Encoder	VCE 4.0	NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder	UVD 7.0	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 0% difference. The Titan X Pascal is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64X	Titan X Pascal
TDP	250W	250W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	600W
Power Connector	Integrated	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	53.5	54.6+2%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 MSRP, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. The Titan X Pascal costs 45.5% less ($1001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the Titan X Pascal offers 86.9% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).