
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 64X across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅1.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 64X across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega 64X better than RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 526 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64X and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile reaches 13,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369+1% | 13,209 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+129% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS+33% | 9.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 2520 MHz+72% |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 256+357% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.8 MB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 35W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 377.4+605% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200 | — |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GB207 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #190 | #244 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













