
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6500M better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon RX 6500M

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 and the Radeon RX 6500M reaches 7,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 7,443+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 4.915 TFLOPS+196% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 2400 MHz+113% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+125% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 980M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 980M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500M) — a 11.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the GeForce GTX 980M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s+11% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 148.9+103% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












