
Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Radeon RX 6300M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 570
2017Radeon RX 6300M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6300M better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and Radeon RX 6300M

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337 | 6,421+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS+7% | 3.686 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 2400 MHz+117% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+75% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+300% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 109.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 35W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 183.5+248% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Navi 24 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #382 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













