
Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

T600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 120W vs 40W.
T600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 120W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 570
2017T600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 120W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 120W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is T600 better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and T600

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

T600
T600
The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T600 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337 | 6,425+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+180% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS+132% | 1.709 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1335 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 640 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1 MB (T600) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the T600's 40W — a 100% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 40W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 160.6+204% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP, while the T600 launched at $200. The T600 costs 33.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 32.1 (T600) — the T600 offers 52.1% better value. The T600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $200-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 32.1+52% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | TU117 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #382 | #378 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













