
Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 570
2017Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX Vega M GH better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 570 make more sense than Radeon RX Vega M GH?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and Radeon RX Vega M GH

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337 | 6,548+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+17% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS+8% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1190 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112+17% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+17% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro 570 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 1024-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 100W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 65.5+24% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #382 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













