
Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.
Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 570
2017Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 570 better than Tesla M6?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M6 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and Tesla M6

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Tesla M6
Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337+2% | 6,225 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+17% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS+9% | 3.625 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1180 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112+17% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 576 KB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 18.2% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 100W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 62.3+18% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 70% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 240.3% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-70% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1+240% | 6.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #382 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













