
Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 229.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 570
2017Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 229.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 7130 better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 570 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 7130?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and Radeon Pro WX 7130

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337 | 6,406+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1243 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 576 KB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 8% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-8% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8+7% | 49.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 70% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 229.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-70% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1+230% | 6.4 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
| Release | June 5 2017 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #382 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













