
Radeon RX 5600
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 334.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅65.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌336.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5600
2020RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 334.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅65.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌336.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000H better than Radeon RX 5600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5600 make more sense than RTX A4000H?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5600 and RTX A4000H

Radeon RX 5600
Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.

RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5600 scores 11,753 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5600 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1265 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,753 | 11,815 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 6144+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.829 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+229% |
| Boost Clock | 1265 MHz | 1560 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4000H gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5600 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H has 8 GB. The RTX A4000H offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 55.6% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s+56% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5600 draws 150W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 6.9% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5600) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 140W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 78.4 | 84.4+8% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The Radeon RX 5600 costs 77.1% less ($771 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.3 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 334.7% better value. The RTX A4000H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-77% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.3+335% | 11.8 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GA104 |
| Release | July 7 2020 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #295 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













