
Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌74.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌74.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega 56 better than Radeon RX 5600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5600 make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 132 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon RX 5600

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5600
Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,104+3% | 11,753 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.96 TFLOPS+54% | 5.829 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1265 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 5600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 150W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.6 | 78.4+36% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 5600 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 51.3 (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 69.3% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3 | 51.3+69% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #222 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













