G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 156.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌50% higher power demand at 210W vs 140W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

RTX A4000H

2021

Why buy it

✅54.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 140W instead of 210W, a 70W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌
150.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

RTX A4000H

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 156.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅54.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 140W instead of 210W, a 70W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌50% higher power demand at 210W vs 140W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Trade-offs

❌
150.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A4000H better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?

Yes. RTX A4000H is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX A4000H averages 54.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,815 vs 12,104 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX A4000H is a 2021 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A4000H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A4000H is the smarter buy by a wide margin. RTX A4000H is about 150.6% more expensive on MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 54.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (11,815 vs 12,104). Radeon Pro Vega 56 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM, 12,104 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro Vega 56 Benchmark Check

RTX A4000H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
1080p
low	95 FPS	130 FPS
medium	82 FPS	112 FPS
high	70 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	64 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	105 FPS
medium	68 FPS	87 FPS
high	53 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	47 FPS
4K
low	31 FPS	47 FPS
medium	28 FPS	41 FPS
high	22 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	25 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega 56 Open RTX A4000H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
1080p
low	267 FPS	261 FPS
medium	227 FPS	218 FPS
high	178 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	156 FPS
1440p
low	189 FPS	187 FPS
medium	162 FPS	150 FPS
high	132 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	106 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	94 FPS
medium	83 FPS	77 FPS
high	71 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	52 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega 56 Open RTX A4000H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
1080p
low	485 FPS	532 FPS
medium	417 FPS	425 FPS
high	363 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	266 FPS
1440p
low	386 FPS	399 FPS
medium	327 FPS	319 FPS
high	272 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	199 FPS
4K
low	245 FPS	266 FPS
medium	202 FPS	213 FPS
high	160 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	133 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega 56 Open RTX A4000H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
1080p
low	176 FPS	282 FPS
medium	144 FPS	246 FPS
high	123 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	127 FPS	217 FPS
medium	107 FPS	193 FPS
high	92 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	132 FPS
medium	61 FPS	113 FPS
high	47 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	73 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega 56 Open RTX A4000H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and RTX A4000H

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A4000H

The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
G3D Mark Score	12,104+2%	11,815
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Ampere
Process Node	14 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3584	6144+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.96 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS+114%
Boost Clock	1250 MHz	1560 MHz+25%
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	224+17%	192
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	6 MB+582%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4000H gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H has 8 GB. The RTX A4000H offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs None (RTX A4000H).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
Encoder	VCE 4.0	None
Decoder	UVD 7.0	None
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	None

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 40% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	RTX A4000H
TDP	210W	140W-33%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	500W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	57.6	84.4+47%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 60.1% less ($601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 156.8% better value. The RTX A4000H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).