
Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5600 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 210W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 210W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 210W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5600 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 210W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 OEM better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM reaches 12,333 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,104 | 12,333+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+75% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.96 TFLOPS+40% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1560 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+75% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 OEM is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 150W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.6 | 82.2+43% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #222 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













