
Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 444.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 9100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅37.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 56: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌451.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 444.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅37.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 56: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 9100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌451.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 9100 better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon Pro WX 9100

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Radeon Pro WX 9100 reaches 12,250 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,104 | 12,250+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4096+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.96 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1500 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | 256+14% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1 MB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 9.1% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W-9% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 57.6+8% | 53.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 launched at $2199. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 81.9% less ($1800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 5.6 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 441.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-82% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3+441% | 5.6 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | July 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #222 | #219 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













