
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌118.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $271 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200
2018Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $271 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌118.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 better than Quadro P5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and Radeon RX 5600

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

Radeon RX 5600
Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,650 | 11,753 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.94 TFLOPS+53% | 5.829 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1746 MHz+38% | 1265 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 5600 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 116.5+49% | 78.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5200 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 5600 costs 54.2% less ($271 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.3 (Quadro P5200) vs 51.3 (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 120.2% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $229-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 51.3+120% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #230 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













