
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌151.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅25.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro P5200
2018Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅25.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌151.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7400 better than Quadro P5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and Radeon RX 7400

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,650 | 11,654 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.94 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 1746 MHz | 2300 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 79.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 43W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 116.5 | 271.0+133% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5200 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 60.2% less ($301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.3 (Quadro P5200) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 151.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $199-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 58.6+152% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #230 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













