
Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅27.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌899.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 902% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M6000 24GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅27.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 902% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M6000 24GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌899.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5200 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 77 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 24GB and Quadro P5200

Quadro M6000 24GB
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,625 | 11,650 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 8.94 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1746 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+60% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+17% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 24GB comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+500% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 46.5 | 116.5+151% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 MSRP, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. The Quadro P5200 costs 90% less ($4499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro P5200 offers 913% better value. The Quadro P5200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $500-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | 23.3+913% |
| Codename | GM200 | GP104 |
| Release | March 5 2016 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #233 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













