Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon Instinct MI60

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Instinct MI60

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1800 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 19.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon Instinct MI60

2018

Why buy it

  • Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M6000 24GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 20% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,000 MSRPvs$4,999 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • 20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Instinct MI60 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,625 vs 11,638 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Instinct MI60 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Instinct MI60 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Instinct MI60 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Instinct MI60 is about 20.0% more expensive on MSRP at $6,000 MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M6000 24GB really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro M6000 24GB is 2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM, 11,625 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
1080p
low160 FPS173 FPS
medium142 FPS150 FPS
high119 FPS129 FPS
ultra86 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low140 FPS136 FPS
medium120 FPS112 FPS
high86 FPS91 FPS
ultra61 FPS57 FPS
4K
low67 FPS55 FPS
medium58 FPS47 FPS
high40 FPS35 FPS
ultra35 FPS30 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
1080p
low191 FPS316 FPS
medium168 FPS274 FPS
high136 FPS224 FPS
ultra105 FPS180 FPS
1440p
low131 FPS214 FPS
medium106 FPS185 FPS
high83 FPS159 FPS
ultra63 FPS126 FPS
4K
low62 FPS101 FPS
medium52 FPS85 FPS
high47 FPS73 FPS
ultra38 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
1080p
low523 FPS524 FPS
medium418 FPS419 FPS
high349 FPS349 FPS
ultra262 FPS262 FPS
1440p
low392 FPS393 FPS
medium314 FPS314 FPS
high262 FPS262 FPS
ultra196 FPS196 FPS
4K
low262 FPS262 FPS
medium209 FPS209 FPS
high174 FPS175 FPS
ultra131 FPS131 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
1080p
low233 FPS276 FPS
medium200 FPS237 FPS
high166 FPS202 FPS
ultra138 FPS164 FPS
1440p
low179 FPS211 FPS
medium157 FPS186 FPS
high125 FPS158 FPS
ultra102 FPS126 FPS
4K
low102 FPS125 FPS
medium82 FPS108 FPS
high65 FPS85 FPS
ultra52 FPS68 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 24GB and Radeon Instinct MI60

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

AMD

Radeon Instinct MI60

The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Radeon Instinct MI60 reaches 11,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1800 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
G3D Mark Score
11,625
11,638
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 5.1
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
3072
4096+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.844 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS+116%
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1800 MHz+62%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
256
256
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+10%
1 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M6000 24GB comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 has 8 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Radeon Instinct MI60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
VRAM Capacity
24 GB+200%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
DirectX
12/1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
VCE 4.1
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
UVD 7.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro M6000 24GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
TDP
250W-17%
300W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
46.5+20%
38.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 MSRP, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000. The Quadro M6000 24GB costs 16.7% less ($1001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Quadro M6000 24GB offers 21.1% better value. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon Instinct MI60
MSRP
$4999-17%
$6000
Performance per Dollar
2.3+21%
1.9
Codename
GM200
Vega 20
Release
March 5 2016
November 18 2018
Ranking
#233
#232