
Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌14% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$4,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌14% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$4,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P40 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro M6000 24GB make more sense than Tesla P40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 24GB and Tesla P40

Quadro M6000 24GB
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,625 | 11,808+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3840+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+72% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1531 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 256+7% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 1.4 MB+27% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 24 GB of video memory. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 0% difference. The Tesla P40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 46.5 | 47.2+2% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The Quadro M6000 24GB costs 12.3% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the Quadro M6000 24GB offers 9.5% better value.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999-12% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3+10% | 2.1 |
| Codename | GM200 | GP102 |
| Release | March 5 2016 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #233 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













