Quadro M6000 24GB vs Tesla P40

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla P40

2016Core: 1303 MHzBoost: 1531 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $700 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 12.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Tesla P40

2016

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 14% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$4,999 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Tesla P40 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,625 vs 11,808 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Tesla P40 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M6000 24GB is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Tesla P40 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Tesla P40 is about 14.0% more expensive on MSRP at $5,699 MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M6000 24GB really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Quadro M6000 24GB make more sense than Tesla P40?
Yes. Quadro M6000 24GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $4,999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Tesla P40. The trade-off is that Tesla P40 currently gives you 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M6000 24GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
1080p
low160 FPS243 FPS
medium142 FPS230 FPS
high119 FPS197 FPS
ultra86 FPS161 FPS
1440p
low140 FPS224 FPS
medium120 FPS189 FPS
high86 FPS151 FPS
ultra61 FPS124 FPS
4K
low67 FPS120 FPS
medium58 FPS99 FPS
high40 FPS75 FPS
ultra35 FPS67 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
1080p
low191 FPS326 FPS
medium168 FPS281 FPS
high136 FPS215 FPS
ultra105 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low131 FPS213 FPS
medium106 FPS179 FPS
high83 FPS146 FPS
ultra63 FPS115 FPS
4K
low62 FPS103 FPS
medium52 FPS84 FPS
high47 FPS70 FPS
ultra38 FPS54 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
1080p
low523 FPS531 FPS
medium418 FPS425 FPS
high349 FPS354 FPS
ultra262 FPS266 FPS
1440p
low392 FPS399 FPS
medium314 FPS319 FPS
high262 FPS266 FPS
ultra196 FPS199 FPS
4K
low262 FPS266 FPS
medium209 FPS213 FPS
high174 FPS177 FPS
ultra131 FPS133 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
1080p
low233 FPS473 FPS
medium200 FPS420 FPS
high166 FPS354 FPS
ultra138 FPS266 FPS
1440p
low179 FPS374 FPS
medium157 FPS319 FPS
high125 FPS266 FPS
ultra102 FPS199 FPS
4K
low102 FPS240 FPS
medium82 FPS213 FPS
high65 FPS177 FPS
ultra52 FPS133 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 24GB and Tesla P40

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

NVIDIA

Tesla P40

The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
G3D Mark Score
11,625
11,808+2%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
3072
3840+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.844 TFLOPS
11.76 TFLOPS+72%
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1531 MHz+37%
ROPs
96
96
TMUs
256+7%
240
L1 Cache
1.1 MB
1.4 MB+27%
L2 Cache
3 MB
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 24 GB of video memory. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
VRAM Capacity
24 GB
24 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+50%
256-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
DirectX
12/1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 0% difference. The Tesla P40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
TDP
250W
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
112mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
46.5
47.2+2%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The Quadro M6000 24GB costs 12.3% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the Quadro M6000 24GB offers 9.5% better value.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBTesla P40
MSRP
$4999-12%
$5699
Performance per Dollar
2.3+10%
2.1
Codename
GM200
GP102
Release
March 5 2016
September 13 2016
Ranking
#233
#227