
Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌194.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 250W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380X
2015Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 250W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌194.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 380X better than Radeon RX 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5500M make more sense than Radeon R9 380X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380X and Radeon RX 5500M

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 380X scores 6,131 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,131+3% | 5,954 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.973 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 970 MHz | 1645 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 380X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 111.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380X) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 224 GB/s+111% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 380X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 98.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380X) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 85W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.5 | 70.0+186% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | — |
| Codename | Antigua | Navi 14 |
| Release | November 19 2015 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #394 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













