Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon R9 380X

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 380X

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6100

G3D Mark Score

6131

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 380X is 0.5% faster than Radeon R9 280X

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon R9 280X3072 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
19%
low57%
medium37%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
9%
low37%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

3 GB VRAM Β· 6,100 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon R9 380X4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
22%
low75%
medium42%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 6,131 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 380X performs 0.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon R9 280X and Radeon R9 380X.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon R9 280X and Radeon R9 380X

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:3072 MB
L1 Cache:512 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Boost Clock:1000 MHz
Shading Units:2048
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:128.0
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt
Floating Point Performance:4.096 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$299
Release Date:October 8 2013
Performance Ranking Position:404
AMD

Radeon R9 380X

The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. Boost clock: 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:512 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Boost Clock:970 MHz
Shading Units:2048
Transistor Count:5,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:124.2
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):190 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.973 TFLOPS
Quantidade De Transportadores Compute:32

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Antigua
Architecture:GCN 3.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Launch Price:$229
Release Date:November 19 2015
Performance Ranking Position:394

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 280X and Radeon R9 380X