Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon R9 380X

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 380X

2015Boost: 970 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 280X

2013

Why buy it

  • 2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 30.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Radeon R9 380X

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 31.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 380X better than Radeon R9 280X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon R9 280X averages 2.8% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,100 vs 6,131 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 380X is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 280X is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 380X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $229 MSRP. Radeon R9 380X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 380X is about $70 cheaper on MSRP at $229 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 280X is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (200W vs 250W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon R9 280X make more sense than Radeon R9 380X?
Yes. Radeon R9 280X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (200W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 380X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 380X currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark and lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.2%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
1080p
low77 FPS78 FPS
medium63 FPS67 FPS
high50 FPS54 FPS
ultra33 FPS35 FPS
1440p
low65 FPS68 FPS
medium54 FPS60 FPS
high38 FPS43 FPS
ultra24 FPS27 FPS
4K
low24 FPS25 FPS
medium23 FPS23 FPS
high14 FPS15 FPS
ultra12 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
1080p
low140 FPS133 FPS
medium116 FPS105 FPS
high95 FPS86 FPS
ultra69 FPS61 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS78 FPS
medium64 FPS58 FPS
high48 FPS44 FPS
ultra35 FPS31 FPS
4K
low35 FPS31 FPS
medium26 FPS23 FPS
high20 FPS18 FPS
ultra15 FPS13 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
1080p
low274 FPS276 FPS
medium220 FPS221 FPS
high183 FPS184 FPS
ultra137 FPS138 FPS
1440p
low206 FPS207 FPS
medium165 FPS166 FPS
high137 FPS138 FPS
ultra103 FPS103 FPS
4K
low137 FPS138 FPS
medium110 FPS110 FPS
high92 FPS92 FPS
ultra69 FPS69 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
1080p
low145 FPS135 FPS
medium118 FPS112 FPS
high102 FPS97 FPS
ultra87 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS100 FPS
medium87 FPS83 FPS
high75 FPS72 FPS
ultra60 FPS58 FPS
4K
low63 FPS60 FPS
medium49 FPS47 FPS
high38 FPS37 FPS
ultra27 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and Radeon R9 380X

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R9 380X

The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
G3D Mark Score
6,100
6,131
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS+3%
3.973 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz+3%
970 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 380X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 171.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s+172%
106 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).

FeatureRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
TDP
200W-20%
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
221mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75
Perf/Watt
30.5+24%
24.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. The Radeon R9 380X costs 23.4% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 31.4% better value. The Radeon R9 380X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 280XRadeon R9 380X
MSRP
$299
$229-23%
Performance per Dollar
20.4
26.8+31%
Codename
Tahiti
Antigua
Release
October 8 2013
November 19 2015
Ranking
#404
#394