
Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅49.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 172% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌167.6% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Radeon R9 280X
2013Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅49.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 172% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌167.6% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 280X better than Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire make more sense than Radeon R9 280X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100+2% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+11% | 900 MHz |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) vs 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — a 6.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire. Bus width: 384-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s (Dual)+7% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 512-bit (Dual)+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5+2% | 30.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800. The Radeon R9 280X costs 62.6% less ($501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 7.5 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 172% better value. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-63% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.4+172% | 7.5 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Neptune CF |
| Release | October 8 2013 | March 1 2014 |
| Ranking | #404 | #348 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













